When Adversity Draws Us Closer - Understanding a Relationship That Was Never Supposed to Become This Deep
There are relationships that begin with a clearly defined purpose.
The boundaries are understood. The responsibilities are established. Each person knows why the other is present. There is no expectation that the relationship will become deeply personal.
Sometimes two people begin working together simply because circumstances require it.
The relationship is functional.
Professional.
Mission-oriented.
Perhaps even temporary.
And then something happens.
Pressure comes.
Conflict comes.
Misunderstanding comes.
Pain comes.
Circumstances that should, at least theoretically, drive people apart somehow have the opposite effect.
Instead of separating, the pressure exposes loyalty.
Instead of destroying trust, hardship reveals it.
Instead of producing distance, adversity creates deeper attachment.
And eventually one finds oneself asking:
“How did we get here?”
That question has profound biblical significance.
The Scriptures repeatedly present situations in which circumstances intended for destruction become occasions through which relationships, loyalties, and purposes are revealed more clearly.
The biblical witness does not teach us that every painful circumstance is automatically sent by God. Nor does Scripture require us to assume that every controversy has been deliberately manufactured by a supernatural enemy.
But Scripture does teach something remarkably important:
God can work through circumstances that were intended for harm, and adversity can reveal relationships that are deeper than either person initially understood.
That may provide one way of understanding a relationship that began as purely work-based but became increasingly significant through the experience of military service, suffering, controversy, and shared adversity.
 |
| Prayer for Couples to Foster Faith, Gratitude, and Spiritual Unity in Their Relationship - Printable PDF |
1. Some Relationships Begin With Assignment Before They Become Affection
The Tanakh frequently distinguishes between relationships formed by ordinary circumstances and relationships that acquire deeper significance through shared purpose.
Consider the relationship between David and Jonathan.
Their relationship did not begin merely as a casual friendship.
There were enormous circumstances surrounding them: political succession, warfare, royal authority, danger, loyalty, and conflicting expectations.
Yet something remarkable developed.
David and Jonathan became deeply committed to one another.
The Tanakh says:
“The soul of Jonathan was knit to the soul of David, and Jonathan loved him as his own soul.”
— 1 Samuel 18:1
That statement is striking because the relationship developed in an environment where political circumstances could have made genuine loyalty extremely difficult.
Jonathan was the son of Saul.
David was the man increasingly recognized as the future king.
Humanly speaking, there were reasons for competition.
Instead, there was covenantal loyalty.
Jonathan even says to David:
“Whatever you say, I will do for you.”
— 1 Samuel 20:4
The relationship had moved beyond convenience.
Something deeper had emerged.
This does not mean that every intense relationship should automatically be interpreted as divinely ordained. Biblical wisdom requires discernment.
But it does demonstrate that shared adversity can reveal dimensions of loyalty that ordinary circumstances never expose.
2. Military Service Has a Way of Revealing People
Military service is an unusual environment for relationships.
People are placed into circumstances involving responsibility, discipline, danger, hierarchy, fatigue, uncertainty, and dependence upon others.
Under ordinary circumstances, one might never discover how another person responds to fear, pressure, betrayal, exhaustion, responsibility, or danger.
But adversity reveals character.
The book of Proverbs states:
“As iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpens another.”
— Proverbs 27:17
The imagery is deliberately uncomfortable.
Iron sharpening iron involves friction.
There is resistance.
There is heat.
There is contact.
There is pressure.
Yet the result is not necessarily destruction.
The result can be refinement.
That provides an important biblical category for understanding relationships forged during difficult seasons.
Sometimes we only discover what someone means to us when circumstances become difficult enough to reveal what was already present beneath the surface.
A relationship that looked purely functional can become deeply meaningful because the people involved have seen one another under conditions that ordinary life never would have produced.
3. Pain Does Not Always Produce Separation
One of the great biblical mysteries is that suffering does not always accomplish what suffering appears designed to accomplish.
The Joseph narrative provides perhaps the clearest example.
Joseph's brothers intended evil against him.
Joseph eventually says:
“You meant evil against me; but God meant it for good.”
— Genesis 50:20
Notice the theological precision.
Joseph does not say that evil was actually good.
He does not say that betrayal was morally acceptable.
He does not say that suffering should simply be celebrated.
He acknowledges the existence of evil while simultaneously recognizing that God can bring about a different outcome through circumstances that others intended for harm.
That distinction matters enormously.
When people experience painful controversies, misunderstandings, betrayals, accusations, or circumstances that seem designed to fracture relationships, the biblical question is not necessarily:
“Was the pain good?”
The more important question may be:
“What is being revealed through the pain?”
That is a different question.
4. The Enemy's Intended Outcome Is Not Always the Final Outcome
The biblical Scriptures frequently portray opposition as something that God can ultimately overrule.
The Psalms repeatedly describe people who rise against the righteous.
Psalm 37 says:
“The wicked plots against the just, and gnashes at him with his teeth. The Lord laughs at him, for He sees that his day is coming.”
— Psalm 37:12–13
The psalmist recognizes something important:
There can be a difference between what someone intends and what ultimately happens.
A person may intend to destroy trust.
Yet trust may become stronger.
Someone may intend to create suspicion.
Yet honest conversation may produce greater understanding.
Someone may attempt to separate people.
Yet shared suffering may cause them to recognize how deeply they depend upon one another.
This is one reason Scripture repeatedly warns against judging a situation solely by its immediate appearance.
5. Controversy Can Reveal What Was Actually Holding the Relationship Together
There is another important biblical principle.
A relationship based exclusively upon convenience can easily collapse when convenience disappears.
But a relationship containing genuine loyalty may become clearer when circumstances become difficult.
Yeshua teaches:
“Greater love has no one than this, than to lay down one's life for his friends.”
— John 15:13
The context of Yeshua's teaching concerns love, loyalty, sacrifice, and friendship.
The principle is much larger than literal physical death.
It describes a willingness to sacrifice one's own comfort, convenience, reputation, time, or security for another person.
That is profoundly relevant to relationships forged in difficult environments.
Sometimes a relationship begins because two people have a task.
Eventually, however, they discover that they care about the person performing the task.
The mission may have introduced them.
But loyalty may have kept them together.
6. “I Honestly Don't Understand It” Is Not an Unbiblical Place to Be
There is something spiritually important about admitting:
“I don't understand why this keeps happening.”
The Tanakh does not demand that faithful people pretend to understand everything.
Job is perhaps Scripture's greatest example.
Job experiences catastrophic loss and spends much of the book wrestling with questions about suffering, justice, and divine providence.
At one point he says:
“But He knows the way that I take; when He has tested me, I shall come forth as gold.”
— Job 23:10
Job does not claim to understand everything.
He does, however, maintain that his life is not invisible to God.
That distinction is crucial.
Faith is not necessarily possessing an explanation for every circumstance.
Sometimes faith means trusting God while the explanation remains incomplete.
7. David and Jonathan Show That Adversity Can Deepen Loyalty
The relationship between David and Jonathan becomes especially significant because adversity does not destroy their loyalty.
Jonathan recognizes David's future even when doing so creates personal cost.
He says:
“You shall be king over Israel, and I shall be next to you.”
— 1 Samuel 23:17
Jonathan understood something that many people struggle to understand:
Another person's elevation does not necessarily diminish your own worth.
This is an extraordinary biblical principle.
Jealousy says:
“If you rise, I must fall.”
Covenantal loyalty says:
“Your good does not have to be my destruction.”
That distinction can transform relationships.
When two people have endured difficult circumstances together, there can develop a profound recognition:
“We know what we have survived together.”
That knowledge cannot easily be replicated by people who were not there.
Shared history becomes a form of relational memory.
8. The Book of Revelation Also Presents Faithfulness Under Pressure
The Book of Revelation repeatedly connects perseverance with difficult circumstances.
Yeshua's revelation to the congregation at Smyrna says:
“Do not fear any of those things which you are about to suffer.”
— Revelation 2:10
He then speaks of faithfulness amid suffering.
The important theme is endurance.
Revelation does not portray hardship as evidence that God has necessarily abandoned His people.
Instead, suffering becomes a context in which faithfulness becomes visible.
This is important when considering relationships as well.
Pressure can expose what is superficial.
But it can also expose what is genuine.
A relationship that survives pressure has accumulated something that did not exist before:
tested history.
9. But We Should Be Careful About Calling Every Controversy “the Enemy”
There is an important scholarly and biblical caution here.
It is possible to recognize spiritual opposition without attributing every disagreement, misunderstanding, bureaucratic problem, interpersonal conflict, or painful event to a supernatural agent.
The Tanakh repeatedly emphasizes human responsibility.
Proverbs says:
“The beginning of strife is like releasing water; therefore stop contention before a quarrel starts.”
— Proverbs 17:14
Sometimes conflict comes from human misunderstanding.
Sometimes from pride.
Sometimes from poor communication.
Sometimes from competing interests.
Sometimes from fear.
Sometimes from institutional structures.
Sometimes from deliberate wrongdoing.
And Scripture gives us categories for all of these.
Therefore, wisdom requires us to ask:
What actually happened?
What did each person say?
What evidence exists?
What assumptions am I making?
What part of the conflict belongs to human behavior?
What part remains uncertain?
This protects us from turning spiritual language into an explanation for everything we cannot understand.
10. Yeshua Teaches Us to Look at the Fruit
One of the most practical teachings of Yeshua is His emphasis upon fruit.
He says:
“Therefore by their fruits you will know them.”
— Matthew 7:20
That principle can be applied carefully to relationships.
Instead of focusing exclusively upon dramatic circumstances, examine the observable fruit.
Does the relationship produce greater honesty?
Greater patience?
Greater responsibility?
Greater compassion?
Greater courage?
Greater faithfulness?
Greater willingness to tell the truth?
Greater willingness to apologize?
Greater willingness to protect another person's dignity?
These are more meaningful indicators than simply asking whether circumstances surrounding the relationship feel mysterious or spiritually intense.
A relationship should be evaluated by what it actually produces.
11. Love Does Not Require the Absence of Conflict
Biblical love is not the same thing as perpetual agreement.
Proverbs says:
“Faithful are the wounds of a friend, but the kisses of an enemy are deceitful.”
— Proverbs 27:6
That verse is extraordinarily realistic.
A genuine relationship may contain difficult conversations.
A genuine friend may tell us something we do not want to hear.
A genuine relationship may survive disagreement precisely because it is strong enough to tolerate truth.
Yeshua likewise teaches direct reconciliation:
“Moreover if your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone.”
— Matthew 18:15
Biblical reconciliation is not built upon pretending that nothing happened.
It is built upon truth.
That means that if controversy repeatedly arises around a relationship, the answer is not necessarily either immediate separation or unquestioning attachment.
The biblical approach is examination, truth, repentance where necessary, forgiveness, wisdom, and discernment.
12. There Is a Difference Between Being Drawn Together and Being Bound Together Unwisely
This distinction is important.
The fact that suffering causes two people to feel closer does not, by itself, prove that every aspect of the relationship is healthy.
Nor does emotional intensity automatically establish divine purpose.
Scripture repeatedly calls God's people to wisdom.
Proverbs says:
“The simple believes every word, but the prudent considers well his steps.”
— Proverbs 14:15
Therefore, we can acknowledge something beautiful without romanticizing it.
Perhaps adversity has revealed genuine loyalty.
Perhaps shared service has created profound understanding.
Perhaps painful circumstances have caused both people to recognize the importance of one another.
Perhaps controversy has forced conversations that would otherwise never have happened.
But wisdom still asks us to examine boundaries, motives, truthfulness, mutual respect, and responsibility.
Deep attachment and sound judgment should not be enemies.
13. Perhaps the Mystery Is Not Why the Pain Happened, but What the Pain Revealed
This may be the most useful way to frame the entire experience.
You began with a relationship that was supposed to be about work.
Then circumstances became difficult.
Pain entered the story.
Controversy appeared.
Perhaps misunderstandings multiplied.
And yet something unexpected happened:
Instead of becoming strangers, you became more familiar.
Instead of becoming indifferent, you became more concerned.
Instead of becoming disconnected, you became more aware of one another.
That does not necessarily mean that every painful circumstance was orchestrated for that purpose.
But it may mean that the circumstances exposed something that was already developing beneath the surface.
The relationship may have contained more substance than either person initially recognized.
14. The Biblical Pattern: What Was Meant to Divide Can Become an Occasion for Faithfulness
The Joseph narrative gives us language for this mystery:
“You meant evil against me; but God meant it for good.”
— Genesis 50:20
The principle is not that evil becomes good.
The principle is that evil does not possess ultimate authority over the outcome.
That is a profound distinction.
A controversy can be real without being sovereign.
Pain can be real without determining the final chapter.
An enemy can oppose without possessing the final word.
And circumstances can become instruments through which people discover courage, loyalty, forgiveness, compassion, and truth.
15. What Should We Do With a Relationship We Do Not Fully Understand?
Perhaps the most biblical response is not to force an explanation.
Instead:
Tell the truth.
Observe the fruit.
Protect integrity.
Practice forgiveness.
Maintain appropriate boundaries.
Refuse unnecessary suspicion.
Do not manufacture certainty where Scripture gives none.
And remain attentive to what God may be teaching through the experience.
Psalm 119 says:
“Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path.”
— Psalm 119:105
Notice the metaphor.
A lamp does not necessarily illuminate the entire road.
It illuminates the next step.
Sometimes that is all we receive.
16. The Relationship May Have Started as Work, But Work Does Not Have to Be the Whole Story
There is nothing strange about a relationship beginning through an assignment and developing into something more meaningful.
Human beings are relational creatures.
We remember who stood beside us.
We remember who helped us when we were exhausted.
We remember who understood what outsiders could not understand.
We remember who saw the difficult seasons firsthand.
Shared experience creates a history.
And history creates meaning.
The Tanakh recognizes the power of remembering what people have endured together.
Ecclesiastes says:
“Two are better than one, because they have a good reward for their labor.”
“For if they fall, one will lift up his companion.”
— Ecclesiastes 4:9–10
That is remarkably relevant to relationships forged through demanding circumstances.
The strength is not merely that two people are together.
The strength is that when one falls, the other can lift him or her up.
17. Perhaps You Are Not Supposed to Understand It All Yet
There are moments when the wisest spiritual response is simply:
“I don't know.”
I don't know why this happened.
I don't know why the controversy produced greater closeness.
I don't know why something that should have created distance instead created understanding.
I don't know what the ultimate purpose will be.
But I can examine the fruit.
I can walk honestly.
I can refuse bitterness.
I can seek wisdom.
I can forgive without abandoning discernment.
I can love without surrendering boundaries.
And I can entrust what I cannot understand to God.
That is not weakness.
It is biblical humility.
Conclusion: Sometimes the Fire Reveals What Was Already There
The biblical story is filled with relationships and communities tested by circumstances they did not choose.
Joseph was betrayed.
David was hunted.
Jonathan lived within a royal family consumed by conflict.
Job endured profound suffering.
The assemblies addressed in Revelation were instructed to remain faithful under pressure.
Yeshua Himself taught His disciples that genuine love is demonstrated through sacrificial faithfulness.
None of these passages teach us to seek suffering.
But they do teach us something about what suffering can reveal.
Pressure exposes foundations.
Conflict exposes loyalties.
Adversity exposes character.
Time exposes fruit.
And sometimes a relationship that began with nothing more than a shared assignment discovers, through years of difficulty, that it contains a depth neither person expected.
Perhaps the most honest response is not to insist that we know exactly why.
Perhaps it is simply to say:
“I don't fully understand why the circumstances that seemed capable of tearing us apart have instead brought us closer. But I can see what the experience has revealed. I can see loyalty where I expected distance. I can see concern where I expected indifference. I can see a relationship that became more significant than the assignment that originally brought us together.”
And then we return to the wisdom of Proverbs:
“Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding; in all your ways acknowledge Him, and He shall direct your paths.”
— Proverbs 3:5–6
The mystery does not have to be solved immediately.
Sometimes faithfulness means continuing to walk while the explanation is still unfolding.
And perhaps that is the lesson:
The circumstances may have been painful, the controversies may have been real, and the original relationship may have been purely functional—but what emerged from those circumstances may reveal that human loyalty, tested character, and genuine care can become far deeper than either person initially expected.
